Tag Archives: Philippe Nassif At Large Position 5

TLCQ 2015: Endorsements in At-Large Races

Position 1— With several noteworthy candidates in this race, it is an admittedly tough decision to go with one over another.  Jenifer Rene Pool‘s decades of experience in the construction industry would be of great benefit as a new Mayor and Council continue to tackle the city’s massive infrastructure needs.  Lane Lewis is a proven public servant with a record of producing extraordinary results during his tenure as chairman of the Harris County Democratic Party.  Either would be an excellent addition to the Council table.  But the time in which Houstonians live points to yet another candidate… Tom McCasland.  Recent years have seen a nearly inconceivable proliferation of area property values, the result of which has left Houston in an affordable housing crisis.  Along with finding a path forward on the city’s pension obligations, affordable housing is sure to be one of the next challenges faced by the local government.  His successful time as head of the Harris County Housing Authority would bring necessary expertise to the people of Houston.  The pick for At-Large Position 1 is Tom McCasland.

 

Position 2— Incumbency is by no means an automatic ticket to reelection, as was seen two years ago, when David Robinson defeated then Council Member Andrew Burks.  But if any incumbent in the At-Large races deserves another term, it is certainly Robinson.  His wealth of knowledge and experience has helped to guide responsible solutions for the city’s Capital Improvement Plan (CIP).  Robinson also understands the importance of planning for the future of a rapidly-growing city, and has been a constant advocate for implementing the right solutions, not just those for “right now”. The pick for At-Large Position 2 is David Robinson.

 

Position 3— Even if one disagrees with Council Member Michael Kubosh, it’s tough not to like him on a personal level.  He is a charismatic and kind-hearted individual, always entertaining and often engaged with people in the community.  But among all of the Council Member’s many God-given political gifts, listening doesn’t seem to be one of them.  Time and again, he has made irresponsible statements, and fluctuates on his positions from one audience to the next.  This was apparent during the fight surrounding Houston’s Equal Rights Ordinance.  Unlike Council Member Brenda Stardig, who opposed HERO while at least maintaining a respectful posture to both sides, Kubosh preached “respect” to the public, but then fell in line with those spreading unnecessary hate and lies when the cameras were off.  Rather than continue the chain of divisiveness, voters should instead consider Doug Peterson for this race.  With a strong record of community activism, Peterson understands that diversity and equality are necessary elements of Houston’s success.  As a Clear Lake resident, he also pledges to work towards bringing better quality of life for residents outside of the inner loop.  Another 1st-time candidate, John LaRue has run a respectable campaign and would bring many positive attributes to the seat, but in this year Peterson is the better choice.  The pick for At-Large Position 3 is Doug Peterson.

 

Position 4— This race is yet another open seat with two very strong candidates… Laurie Robinson and Amanda Edwards.  Either would serve the people of Houston with extraordinary commitment and common-sense pragmatism.  But for this election cycle, Amanda Edwards proves to be the best choice.  Though Robinson holds a wealth of experience in municipal government, Edwards’ time as a staff member for U.S. Congresswoman Sheila Jackson-Lee shows that she understands the intricacies of constituent service.  Her experience in municipal finance law is also timely in light of the city’s fiscal challenges.  The pick for At-Large Position 4 is Amanda Edwards.

 

Position 5— Like Kubosh, there’s no denying that Council Member Jack Christie is personally a likeable guy.  But once again, personality cannot make up for a host of irresponsible comments and questionable positions around the Council Table.  This year, the clear choice is candidate Philippe Nassif.   He may not have the advantage of incumbency, but Nassif’s impressive experience working for The White House, Mayor Annise Parker and one of the world’s largest humanitarian organizations will ensure that he brings a needed global perspective to one of the world’s emerging global cities.  In particular, his expansive work in helping to combat poverty and encourage affordable housing will prove necessary attributes to solve Houston’s upcoming challenges.  The pick for At-Large Position 5 is Philippe Nassif.

 

Houston-City-Flag

 

 

TLCQ 2015: Philippe Nassif

In the First installment of the 2015 Texas Leftist Candidate Questionnaire, we hear from Philippe Nassif, a candidate for Houston City Council, At Large position 5.

Please note: Responses are directly from the candidate, and have been posted ver batim from the email received. This is done out of fairness to all candidates. Publishing these responses does not constitute an endorsement, but may be considered during the endorsement process.

 

TL:  What is your name, as it will appear on the ballot?

PN:  Philippe Nassif

 

TL:  Are you a current or former elected official? If so what office(s)?

PN:  I am not. I am a first time candidate.

 

TL:  As a political candidate, you clearly care about what happens in certain levels of government. In your own words, why is government important?

PN:  Government is important not simply because it provides us as individuals with certain services and benefits, but also because it is the primary way to promote important values that are good for us and that is in the public interest.  Values such as Justice, Liberty, and Equality are important for all of us and government is here to protect and promote them for all of its citizens.

 

TL:  If elected, what is your top priority in office for the upcoming term? Describe how you plan to accomplish it.

PN:  My first priority in office would be to convene state and local elected officials after declaring Houston in an state of  “ traffic emergency” to  figure out quick and efficient practices the city can do with the resources we have to fix our traffic and pothole issues. This coalition will work with other transportation groups to see what has worked in other cities and states around the country and put those into our best practices, as we involve all levels of government and community organizations. The end result would be an overhaul of speed limits in neighborhoods, promoting bus usage, light rail planning, debris free roads, bike lanes and biker safety, and better planning for our highway systems to meet a booming population.

 

TL:  After decades of deferred maintenance and neglect, Houston’s infrastructure is in a critical state of disrepair. Ask any driver, cyclist or pedestrian, and they can readily tell you that city streets and sidewalks are crumbling… some to the extent that they pose significant danger to those that would traverse them. The Parker Administration has attempted to address the problem by the voter-approved ReBuild Houston program. Knowing that the next Mayor has no choice but to invest in city infrastructure, do you support the continuation of ReBuild Houston?  If yes, please explain why.  If no, please explain how you would address our copious infrastructure needs differently.   

PN:  I support ReBuild Houston, however there needs to be an increase in transparency so that Houstonians can be confident that funds are being spent efficiently.  I would like to see it strengthened in order to accommodate our rapidly growing population and increasing drive towards urbanization and densification. I would also like to see ReBuild Houston projects advance in low income communities where investment in infrastructure is needed most.

 

TL:  At present, the city of Houston has one of the strongest forms of “strong-Mayor governance” in the state of Texas, to the point that the Mayor alone decides what business comes before City Council. If elected, would you support an amendment to the City Charter that would allow any coalition of 6 Council Members to place items on the Council Agenda without prior approval from the Mayor? Whether yes or no, please explain your answer.

 PN:  I would most certainly support such an amendment. A healthy democracy is one that is characterized by debate and the free exchange of ideas. It is difficult for our city government to fully function and effectively carry out its duties if City Council is unable to even place an item on the agenda. I believe the time has come for us to correct this issue and empower City Council to play the role it is intended to play in order to better serve the people of Houston.

 

TL:  If elected, would you support and seek to continue the current administration’s Complete Streets policy, which establishes that any new or significant re-build of city streets will work to prioritize and incorporate safe access for all road users, including pedestrians, persons with disabilities and cyclists?  

PN:  I would absolutely continue to seek the complete streets policy implementation and support it in full. We need to repair our infrastructure and in that same process modernize it by making it more pedestrian and cyclist friendly.

 

TL:  What makes you the best candidate for this office?

PN:  Both of my parents immigrated to the United States. My father came in the 1970’s from Lebanon and my mother came from Mexico. They raised me along with my two siblings with a philosophy that we have to give back to the country that welcomed them and allowed them to build their career and family, and also to respect all viewpoints and beliefs of those around us. I am running for Houston City Council At-Large Position 5 because I want to serve the people of Houston and give back to the city that has given myself and my family so much. At-large position 5 is currently held by an incumbent who has continuously voted contrary to the interests of the majority of Houstonians. He took office promising Houstonians that he would serve the public and move our city into the future, but has instead voted against our interests time and time again, such as his vote against HERO, vaccinations for underserved children, fixing potholes, and other major infrastructure issues. What we need is a leader who will listen to the people, lead on issues that matter to Houston, and serve the public and not work against it. At-Large members should be in the community, looking at the larger policy issues that affect all of Houston, not hiding in city hall. I will be a community focused at large member who will stand shoulder to shoulder with the all Houstonians and working people, ensuring our rights are respected, our economy continues to grow, that people are safe, and our infrastructure is sound. This is why I believe I am the best candidate for Houston City Council At-Large Position 5.

 

TL:  When not on the campaign trail, how do you like to spend your free time?

PN:  I spend my free time with my girlfriend and family enjoying Houston’s many amenities! Experiencing Houston’s booming restaurant and café scene with friends and family is one of my favorite things to do. I also enjoy biking along buffalo bayou, running in memorial park, and other outdoor activities. I have been a lifelong martial artist and practice Muay Thai at Houston Muay Thai in downtown, in addition to going to the gym regularly. And I am a big reader as well!

 

Thanks to Mr. Nassif for the responses.

pn