The greater Houston area has received four ‘100-year” storms in the past twelve months. PDiddie at Brains and Eggs thinks it’s either time to find a new name for these apocalyptic floods, or perhaps address the various root causes (climate change, too much concrete, greedy land developers) of them.
For many residents of Greater Houston, especially those still caught in the throes of disaster, the April 18th are likely still a very sensitive subject. Across wide swaths of the region, residents are enduring the terrible headaches of ripping up flooring, towing cars, trashing molded furniture, rewiring electrical systems and waiting for insurance companies to call. And those are the most fortunate. For the poorest citizens, the historic floods from this week have left many homeless, hungry and devastated.
But at some point, we must begin to question how and why such devastation can befall the region. If “historic flooding” can occur twice in less than a year, just how historic is it? According to Jon Erdman of The Weather Channel, the answer to these questions are more obvious than many Houstonians would like to admit…
If you’re unlucky, you may have dealt with major flooding perhaps once or twice in your life. But Houstonians, even transplants who have only spent a few years in southeast Texas, likely have experienced flooding multiple times —sometimes in the same year.
One could make a strong argument that Houston is the nation’s flash flood capital.
According to NOAA’s National Centers for Environmental Information, there were 96 days with at least one report of flooding or flash flooding in Harris County from 1996 through 2015. This equates to anaverage of 4-5 days of flooding each year over that time period.
Of course, not all of these flood events are as severe as April 2016, Memorial Day 2015, or Allison in 2001. The fact that flooding happens with such regularity most years in an area just slightly larger than the state of Rhode Island is quite impressive.
These events have happened every time of the year, even in late fall and winter.
Apart from the prodigious rainfall from tropical cyclones and their remnants, thunderstorms and thunderstorm clusters tend to slow and stall near the Gulf Coast, especially from late spring through early fall.
In case anyone was in doubt, the data is clear. Floods will happen across Houston region and Southeast Texas. These “historic events” are not a matter of if, but when.
Realizing this as fact also means accepting that we cannot stop floods, but we must be prepared for them. So there’s the problem. But what, if anything can Houston actually do about it? Here are a few suggestions…
Close roads, save lives. As much of a tragedy as flooded homes and businesses create, they are not the predominant cause of death in these flood events. The far more dangerous situations occur when drivers get caught on flooded roads. But as Harris County Judge Ed Emmett knows, these deaths are preventable. Officials know which roads are most likely to flood in a significant rain event, because they are virtually the same ones that have flooded every time. Closing these roads would save lives. It’s also important to increase awareness for residents of just how Houston’s flood prevention system works. The central to this system in large flood event?? ROADS. Once the bayous and creeks fill up, the next place which water collects in Houston are the roads themselves. Ever wondered why sections of all major Houston freeways are trenches? It’s because they are meant to fill with water in a flood event.
Stop building “out” and start building smart. Some of these changes are already occurring in parts of Houston as a result of reaching critical density, but protecting this region from flooding means a full recognition that we cannot continue to build new developments in areas designated as part of the primary flood plain. Of course, such radical change isn’t really possible without more cohesive regulation (yes I said it… ZONING). But for those that are already in a flood plain, it’s time to seek some smart building strategies… flood gates, raising home and business levels, and massive flood protection work like Project Braysmust become one of the region’s top priorities. It would take a massive effort and lots of coordination between all levels of the public and private sector, but it can be done. Case in point? The Texas Medical Center.
Building on the example of the TMC’s innovative flood alert and prevention system, we know that mitigating flood damage in the area is possible. The only question that remains… Can we find the will to do work?
It’s an old but often true saying that “everything’s bigger in Texas”. But if that’s the case, shouldn’t the shame felt by two-faced Republican leaders be out-sized as well?
For the latest example, let’s take the foolish games that the Texas Governor and Republican-dominated Legislature continue to play around Medicaid Expansion. For 5 years now, Texas has shown total opposition to the possibility of expanding the federal program under the Affordable Care Act. Leaders in Austin have done this even as their citizens continue to suffer under a lesser standard of care than other states, all based on the principle that Texas “doesn’t want any help” from the Federal Government.
Yep… that’s what the mostly Republican lawmakers say. But according to Edgar Walters of the Texas Tribune, what they do is an entirely different story…
State health officials confirmed Tuesday they have asked the Obama administration to keep a 15-month lifeline of federal Medicaid money flowing into Texas to help hospitals treat uninsured patients.
That money would offer temporary relief to health care providers who face losing the funds — some $3.1 billion annually — over state leaders’ refusal to provide government-subsidized health coverage to low-income adults under the Affordable Care Act, President Obama’s signature health law.
Federal officials previously signaled they would stop footing the bill for at least some of Texas’ costs for “uncompensated care” — the burden on hospitals when patients can’t pay for their visits. Under the Affordable Care Act, Texas was encouraged to expand its Medicaid program to cover nearly 1 million additional adults living in poverty — a move that would have given more poor patients a means to pay for care. The state’s Republican leadership has vehemently opposed that option, criticizing Medicaid as an inefficient government program.
In a letter dated April 7 and first released to The Texas Tribune on Tuesday, Texas health officials asked the federal government to continue the funding for uncompensated care for one year and to pony up an unspecified prorated amount for an additional three months. It is unclear if the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, which oversee those federal funds, will approve the state’s request.
Yes you read that correctly. While the lawmakers hurl criticism at Obama and practice politically-convenient ideology, they leave state health officials to grovel for funding and hang Texas hospitals out into an uncertain future.
Baseless opposition without realistic solutions? Maybe it’s time for some Austin lawmakers to grow up.